Categories: Alabama Case Law

PEARSON v. HANCOCK SON, 201 Ala. 428 (1918)

78 So. 806

PEARSON v. HANCOCK SON.

5 Div. 705.Supreme Court of Alabama.
April 18, 1918.

J. W. Strother, of Dadeville, for appellant. George A. Sorrell, of Alexander City, for appellee.

MAYFIELD, J.

If there be any error in the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment of the lower court, that error is based on a finding of facts. It has been uniformly ruled by this court that we would not review the Court of Appeals as to findings of facts. If the facts as found by the Court of Appeals are as stated in the opinion, then the decision is correct. We find no principle of law decided erroneously.

It results that the application for certiorari must be denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 78 So. 806

Recent Posts

SCALES v. STATE, 96 Ala. 69 (1892)

Nov 1892 · Alabama Supreme Court 96 Ala. 69 Scales v. The State HEADNOTES Indictment for Murder.…

2 weeks ago

LOVETT v. LOVETT, 11 Ala. 763 (1847)

11 Ala. 763 Supreme Court of Alabama LOVETT v. LOVETT Attorneys Hopkins, for plaintiff in…

2 weeks ago

STATE v. SOLOMON, 274 So.3d 1017 (2018)

274 So.3d 1017 (2018) STATE of Alabama v. David Thomas SOLOMON and Carrie Cabri Witt.…

4 years ago

EX PARTE KIDD, 105 So.3d 1265 (2012)

105 So.3d 1265 (2012) Ex parte William Darnell KIDD. In re William Darnell Kidd v.…

8 years ago

KIDD v. STATE, 105 So.3d 1261 (2012)

105 So.3d 1261 (2012) William Darnell KIDD v. STATE of Alabama. CR-10-1487.Court of Criminal Appeals…

8 years ago