Categories: Alabama Case Law

GARDNER v. STATE, 21 Ala. App. 208 (1926)

106 So. 894

GARDNER v. STATE.

3 Div. 511.Court of Appeals of Alabama.
January 12, 1926.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Lowndes County; A. E. Gamble, Judge.

James Gardner was convicted of possessing a still, and he appeals. Reversed and remanded.

R. L. Goldsmith, of Hayneville, for appellant.

Counsel argues for error in refusal of the affirmative charge, but without citing authorities.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

Brief of counsel did not reach the Reporter.

SAMFORD, J.

The sheriff found a still located in a ditch or gully, surrounded by some scrub oaks, and about 300 yards from defendant’s house. The landlord, being examined by the state, testified that defendant was not in possession of the land where the still was found. No connection between the still and defendant is shown. The defendant is presumed to be innocent until his guilt is established by competent evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. The state in this case has not met the burden of proof. The defendant was entitled to the affirmative charge, and for the error in refusing this charge the judgment is reversed and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 106 So. 894

Recent Posts

SCALES v. STATE, 96 Ala. 69 (1892)

Nov 1892 · Alabama Supreme Court 96 Ala. 69 Scales v. The State HEADNOTES Indictment for Murder.…

2 weeks ago

LOVETT v. LOVETT, 11 Ala. 763 (1847)

11 Ala. 763 Supreme Court of Alabama LOVETT v. LOVETT Attorneys Hopkins, for plaintiff in…

2 weeks ago

STATE v. SOLOMON, 274 So.3d 1017 (2018)

274 So.3d 1017 (2018) STATE of Alabama v. David Thomas SOLOMON and Carrie Cabri Witt.…

4 years ago

EX PARTE KIDD, 105 So.3d 1265 (2012)

105 So.3d 1265 (2012) Ex parte William Darnell KIDD. In re William Darnell Kidd v.…

8 years ago

KIDD v. STATE, 105 So.3d 1261 (2012)

105 So.3d 1261 (2012) William Darnell KIDD v. STATE of Alabama. CR-10-1487.Court of Criminal Appeals…

8 years ago