Categories: Alabama Case Law

FLORENCE DISCOUNT CO. v. MORRIS, 24 Ala. App. 634 (1930)

129 So. 923

FLORENCE DISCOUNT CO. v. C. V. MORRIS, etc.

8 Div. 890.Court of Appeals of Alabama.
June 30, 1930.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Colbert County; J. Fred Johnson, Jr., Judge.

L. R. Timberlake, of Florence, for appellant.

A. H. Carmichael, of Tuscumbia, for appellee.

RICE, J.

This was a suit by appellant against appellee for an amount due on a negotiable promissory note.

Appellant was, as we read the record, shown by the undisputed testimony to be a “holder in due course” of the instrument sued on. Code 1923, § 9078. And it was also without dispute that the same was due and unpaid.

We find nothing in the record justifying the refusal of the trial court to give to the jury, at appellant’s request, the general affirmative charge, with hypothesis, to find in its favor; and for the error in its refusal the judgment must be and is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 129 So. 923

Recent Posts

SCALES v. STATE, 96 Ala. 69 (1892)

Nov 1892 · Alabama Supreme Court 96 Ala. 69 Scales v. The State HEADNOTES Indictment for Murder.…

1 week ago

LOVETT v. LOVETT, 11 Ala. 763 (1847)

11 Ala. 763 Supreme Court of Alabama LOVETT v. LOVETT Attorneys Hopkins, for plaintiff in…

1 week ago

STATE v. SOLOMON, 274 So.3d 1017 (2018)

274 So.3d 1017 (2018) STATE of Alabama v. David Thomas SOLOMON and Carrie Cabri Witt.…

4 years ago

EX PARTE KIDD, 105 So.3d 1265 (2012)

105 So.3d 1265 (2012) Ex parte William Darnell KIDD. In re William Darnell Kidd v.…

8 years ago

KIDD v. STATE, 105 So.3d 1261 (2012)

105 So.3d 1261 (2012) William Darnell KIDD v. STATE of Alabama. CR-10-1487.Court of Criminal Appeals…

8 years ago