168 So.2d 619
1 Div. 222.Supreme Court of Alabama.
November 5, 1964.
Appeal from the Circuit Court, Mobile County, Jos. M. Hocklander, J.
Samuel W. Inge, Mobile, for appellant.
Vincent F. Kilborn, Mobile, for appellees.
HARWOOD, Justice.
The appellee has moved that this judgment be affirmed because no errors have been assigned.
The suing out of an appeal is analogous to the institution of a new suit. The assignment of errors correspond to the complaint or bill in the original proceedings. Snellings v. Jones, 33 Ala. App. 301, 33 So.2d 371. Without any assignment of error, an appeal can present nothing for review. This defect is jurisdictional.
Appellee’s motion, though superfluous, is due to be granted. Had no motion been filed, the judgment would of necessity stand affirmed. Tidwell v. Town of Town Creek, 264 Ala. 330, 87 So.2d 646; Patterson v. Gains, 264 Ala. 183, 85 So.2d 892; Erwin v. Erwin, 269 Ala. 632, 114 So.2d 918; Supreme Court Rule 1.
Affirmed.
LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and MERRILL, JJ., concur.
Nov 1892 · Alabama Supreme Court 96 Ala. 69 Scales v. The State HEADNOTES Indictment for Murder.…
11 Ala. 763 Supreme Court of Alabama LOVETT v. LOVETT Attorneys Hopkins, for plaintiff in…
274 So.3d 1017 (2018) STATE of Alabama v. David Thomas SOLOMON and Carrie Cabri Witt.…
105 So.3d 1265 (2012) Ex parte William Darnell KIDD. In re William Darnell Kidd v.…
105 So.3d 1261 (2012) William Darnell KIDD v. STATE of Alabama. CR-10-1487.Court of Criminal Appeals…