Categories: Alabama Case Law

PICKETT v. STATE, 20 Ala. App. 692 (1925)

104 So. 924

Louis PICKETT v. STATE.

7 Div. 9.Court of Appeals of Alabama.
May 26, 1925.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Shelby County; E.S. Lyman, Judge. Violating prohibition law.

L.L. Saxon, of Columbiana, for appellant.

Harwell G. Davis, Atty. Gen., for the State.

BRICKEN, P.J.

The evidence contained in this transcript has been carefully examined and considered by this court, and we have reached the conclusion that the state failed to meet the burden of proof necessary to a conviction. The probabilities of innocence are too numerous to permit this conviction to stand. This is conceded by the Attorney General, who represents the state in this court. The court erred in refusing to give the general affirmative charge requested in writing by defendant. The numerous other insistences of error need not be considered. Reversed and remanded.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 104 So. 924

Recent Posts

SCALES v. STATE, 96 Ala. 69 (1892)

Nov 1892 · Alabama Supreme Court 96 Ala. 69 Scales v. The State HEADNOTES Indictment for Murder.…

2 weeks ago

LOVETT v. LOVETT, 11 Ala. 763 (1847)

11 Ala. 763 Supreme Court of Alabama LOVETT v. LOVETT Attorneys Hopkins, for plaintiff in…

2 weeks ago

STATE v. SOLOMON, 274 So.3d 1017 (2018)

274 So.3d 1017 (2018) STATE of Alabama v. David Thomas SOLOMON and Carrie Cabri Witt.…

4 years ago

EX PARTE KIDD, 105 So.3d 1265 (2012)

105 So.3d 1265 (2012) Ex parte William Darnell KIDD. In re William Darnell Kidd v.…

8 years ago

KIDD v. STATE, 105 So.3d 1261 (2012)

105 So.3d 1261 (2012) William Darnell KIDD v. STATE of Alabama. CR-10-1487.Court of Criminal Appeals…

8 years ago