Categories: Alabama Case Law

LOUISVILLE NASHVILLE R. CO. v. FRIZZLE, 215 Ala. 698 (1926)

109 So. 922

LOUISVILLE NASHVILLE R. CO. v. Helen B. FRIZZLE.

3 Div. 781.Supreme Court of Alabama.
October 21, 1926.

C. P. McIntyre, of Montgomery, for petitioner.

Weil, Stakely Vardaman and S. H. Dent, all of Montgomery, opposed.

PER CURIAM.

Petition of the Louisville Nashville Railroad Company for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in the case of Louisville N. R. Co. v. Frizzle, 21 Ala. App. 682, 109 So. 925. Writ denied.

SOMERVILLE, GARDNER, THOMAS, and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 109 So. 922

Recent Posts

SCALES v. STATE, 96 Ala. 69 (1892)

Nov 1892 · Alabama Supreme Court 96 Ala. 69 Scales v. The State HEADNOTES Indictment for Murder.…

3 weeks ago

LOVETT v. LOVETT, 11 Ala. 763 (1847)

11 Ala. 763 Supreme Court of Alabama LOVETT v. LOVETT Attorneys Hopkins, for plaintiff in…

3 weeks ago

STATE v. SOLOMON, 274 So.3d 1017 (2018)

274 So.3d 1017 (2018) STATE of Alabama v. David Thomas SOLOMON and Carrie Cabri Witt.…

4 years ago

EX PARTE KIDD, 105 So.3d 1265 (2012)

105 So.3d 1265 (2012) Ex parte William Darnell KIDD. In re William Darnell Kidd v.…

8 years ago

KIDD v. STATE, 105 So.3d 1261 (2012)

105 So.3d 1261 (2012) William Darnell KIDD v. STATE of Alabama. CR-10-1487.Court of Criminal Appeals…

8 years ago