Categories: Alabama Case Law

GOLDSTEIN v. HARRIS, 221 Ala. 612 (1930)

130 So. 315

Henry GOLDSTEIN, etc., v. Claire E. HARRIS.

6 Div. 669.Supreme Court of Alabama.
October 16, 1930.

Patrick Appelbaum and Richard H. Fries, all of Birmingham, for petitioner.

Coleman, Coleman, Spain Stewart, of Birmingham, for respondent.

THOMAS, J.

Petition of Henry Goldstein, doing business as Hudson Bay Fur Company, for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that court in Goldstein v. Harris, 130 So. 313.

We concur in the result announced on the principle stated in the opinion of the Court of Appeals, that the specific moneys were obtained from the insurance company, and ex aequo et bono belonged to plaintiff; hence the right of recovery.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SAYRE and BROWN, JJ., concur.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 130 So. 315

Recent Posts

SCALES v. STATE, 96 Ala. 69 (1892)

Nov 1892 · Alabama Supreme Court 96 Ala. 69 Scales v. The State HEADNOTES Indictment for Murder.…

3 weeks ago

LOVETT v. LOVETT, 11 Ala. 763 (1847)

11 Ala. 763 Supreme Court of Alabama LOVETT v. LOVETT Attorneys Hopkins, for plaintiff in…

3 weeks ago

STATE v. SOLOMON, 274 So.3d 1017 (2018)

274 So.3d 1017 (2018) STATE of Alabama v. David Thomas SOLOMON and Carrie Cabri Witt.…

4 years ago

EX PARTE KIDD, 105 So.3d 1265 (2012)

105 So.3d 1265 (2012) Ex parte William Darnell KIDD. In re William Darnell Kidd v.…

8 years ago

KIDD v. STATE, 105 So.3d 1261 (2012)

105 So.3d 1261 (2012) William Darnell KIDD v. STATE of Alabama. CR-10-1487.Court of Criminal Appeals…

8 years ago