Categories: Alabama Case Law

BROWN v. STATE, 235 Ala. 360 (1938)

179 So. 262

BROWN v. STATE.

6 Div. 273.Supreme Court of Alabama.
February 17, 1938.

V. H. Carmichael, of Jasper, for petitioner.

A. A. Carmichael, Atty. Gen., for the State.

FOSTER, Justice.

There is no principle of law declared in the opinion of the Court of Appeals which is sought to be reviewed. The only matter discussed is whether the record shows sufficient corroboration of the testimony of the accomplice. The corroborating evidence is not set out in the opinion.

It is not our province on certiorari to go through the record and search for the corroborating evidence, to determine whether it is sufficient. We have so held many times. The opinion is not open for review on the point argued.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 179 So. 262

Recent Posts

SCALES v. STATE, 96 Ala. 69 (1892)

Nov 1892 · Alabama Supreme Court 96 Ala. 69 Scales v. The State HEADNOTES Indictment for Murder.…

3 weeks ago

LOVETT v. LOVETT, 11 Ala. 763 (1847)

11 Ala. 763 Supreme Court of Alabama LOVETT v. LOVETT Attorneys Hopkins, for plaintiff in…

3 weeks ago

STATE v. SOLOMON, 274 So.3d 1017 (2018)

274 So.3d 1017 (2018) STATE of Alabama v. David Thomas SOLOMON and Carrie Cabri Witt.…

4 years ago

EX PARTE KIDD, 105 So.3d 1265 (2012)

105 So.3d 1265 (2012) Ex parte William Darnell KIDD. In re William Darnell Kidd v.…

8 years ago

KIDD v. STATE, 105 So.3d 1261 (2012)

105 So.3d 1261 (2012) William Darnell KIDD v. STATE of Alabama. CR-10-1487.Court of Criminal Appeals…

8 years ago