Categories: Alabama Case Law

CHEROKEE MINERAL SPRINGS CO. v. CARROLL., 264 Ala. 618 (1956)

89 So.2d 83

CHEROKEE MINERAL SPRINGS COMPANY et al. v. W. E. CARROLL et al.

1 Div. 668.Supreme Court of Alabama.
July 26, 1956.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Mobile County, Claude A. Grayson, J.

Page 619

F. R. Ingram and W. E. Prescott, III, Birmingham, for appellants.

Hamilton, Denniston, Butler Riddick and Gaillard
Gaillard, Mobile, for appellees.

SPANN, Justice.

This case is before us for consideration under revised Supreme Court Rule 17, Code 1940, Tit. 7, Appendix.

On June 13, 1956, appellees filed their statement in writing under the rule to the effect that in the opinion of appellees this appeal was brought in this court merely for delay.

No denial having been filed by appellants and the record having been examined and considered, we are of the opinion that the case comes within the rule and that the judgment of the Circuit Court should be affirmed.

Affirmed.

LIVINGSTON, C. J., and SIMPSON and MERRILL, JJ., concur.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 89 So.2d 83

Recent Posts

SCALES v. STATE, 96 Ala. 69 (1892)

Nov 1892 · Alabama Supreme Court 96 Ala. 69 Scales v. The State HEADNOTES Indictment for Murder.…

3 weeks ago

LOVETT v. LOVETT, 11 Ala. 763 (1847)

11 Ala. 763 Supreme Court of Alabama LOVETT v. LOVETT Attorneys Hopkins, for plaintiff in…

3 weeks ago

STATE v. SOLOMON, 274 So.3d 1017 (2018)

274 So.3d 1017 (2018) STATE of Alabama v. David Thomas SOLOMON and Carrie Cabri Witt.…

4 years ago

EX PARTE KIDD, 105 So.3d 1265 (2012)

105 So.3d 1265 (2012) Ex parte William Darnell KIDD. In re William Darnell Kidd v.…

8 years ago

KIDD v. STATE, 105 So.3d 1261 (2012)

105 So.3d 1261 (2012) William Darnell KIDD v. STATE of Alabama. CR-10-1487.Court of Criminal Appeals…

8 years ago