110 So. 917
7 Div. 661.Supreme Court of Alabama.
November 4, 1926.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; O. A. Steele, Judge.
Victor Vance, of Gadsden, for appellants.
W. J. Boykin and J. F. Duke, both of Gadsden, for appellees.
THOMAS, J.
The suit was for the statutory penalty for failure to satisfy the record of a mortgage executed by several mortgagors. The trial resulted in a nonsuit, with a bill of exceptions, because of the sustaining of the defendants’ motion to exclude the notice for satisfaction, because it was not signed by all of the mortgagors. Section 9023 (4898) of the Code; Wilkerson v. Sorsby, 201 Ala. 182, 77 So. 708; Butler Co. v. Brooks, 204 Ala. 195, 85 So. 778; Jowers v. Brown Bros., 137 Ala. 582, 34 So. 827; Jarratt v. McCabe, 75 Ala. 325; Scott v. Fields, 75 Ala. 419; Grooms v. Hannon, 59 Ala. 510; McClendon v. Henderson Land Development Co., 9 Ala. App. 480, 63 So. 811. See Hamilton v. Hussmann Ref. Sup. Co., 214 Ala. 376, 108 So. 50, for recent strict construction of this penal statute. The judgment of the lower court is affirmed. Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
Nov 1892 · Alabama Supreme Court 96 Ala. 69 Scales v. The State HEADNOTES Indictment for Murder.…
11 Ala. 763 Supreme Court of Alabama LOVETT v. LOVETT Attorneys Hopkins, for plaintiff in…
274 So.3d 1017 (2018) STATE of Alabama v. David Thomas SOLOMON and Carrie Cabri Witt.…
105 So.3d 1265 (2012) Ex parte William Darnell KIDD. In re William Darnell Kidd v.…
105 So.3d 1261 (2012) William Darnell KIDD v. STATE of Alabama. CR-10-1487.Court of Criminal Appeals…