Categories: Alabama Case Law

LOUISVILLE N. R. CO. v. LANGSTON, 216 Ala. 693 (1927)

112 So. 917

LOUISVILLE N. R. CO. v. Cleve LANGSTON.

6 Div. 388.Supreme Court of Alabama.
March 31, 1927.

Jones Thomas, of Montgomery, and McClellan, Rice Stone, W. W. Kennedy, and J. K. Jackson, all of Birmingham, for appellant.

W. A. Denson, of Birmingham, for appellee.

SAYRE, J.

The question whether the workman in this case was totally disabled by the accident he suffered was a question of fact, as to which there was some conflict in the evidence. Such questions are not reviewable. The court here finds that the decree was substantially correct and will order an affirmance. Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.

jdjungle

Share
Published by
jdjungle
Tags: 112 So. 917

Recent Posts

SCALES v. STATE, 96 Ala. 69 (1892)

Nov 1892 · Alabama Supreme Court 96 Ala. 69 Scales v. The State HEADNOTES Indictment for Murder.…

4 weeks ago

LOVETT v. LOVETT, 11 Ala. 763 (1847)

11 Ala. 763 Supreme Court of Alabama LOVETT v. LOVETT Attorneys Hopkins, for plaintiff in…

4 weeks ago

STATE v. SOLOMON, 274 So.3d 1017 (2018)

274 So.3d 1017 (2018) STATE of Alabama v. David Thomas SOLOMON and Carrie Cabri Witt.…

4 years ago

EX PARTE KIDD, 105 So.3d 1265 (2012)

105 So.3d 1265 (2012) Ex parte William Darnell KIDD. In re William Darnell Kidd v.…

8 years ago

KIDD v. STATE, 105 So.3d 1261 (2012)

105 So.3d 1261 (2012) William Darnell KIDD v. STATE of Alabama. CR-10-1487.Court of Criminal Appeals…

8 years ago