GARNER v. DECATUR UTILITIES, 709 So.2d 1309 (Ala.Civ.App. 1998)
709 So.2d 1309
2970072.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama.
February 20, 1998.
Appeal from the Morgan Circuit Court, No. CV-97-226, Sherrie W. Brown, J.
William L. Hanbery, Florence, for appellant.
Albert L. Vreeland II of Lehr, Middlebrooks, Price Proctor, P.C., Birmingham, for appellee.Page 1310
CRAWLEY, Judge.
Leonard D. Garner sued Decatur Utilities, seeking workers’ compensation benefits and alleging retaliatory discharge. Decatur Utilities filed a motion to dismiss the retaliatory discharge claim; the trial court granted that motion. Garner appeals from that dismissal. Because his workers’ compensation claim remains pending in the trial court, we must dismiss the appeal.
An appeal ordinarily lies only from a final judgment. Ala. Code 1975, ? 12-22-2; Bean v. Craig, 557 So.2d 1249, 1253
(Ala. 1990). A judgment is generally not final unless allclaims or the rights or liabilities of all parties have been decided. Ex parte Harris, 506 So.2d 1003, 1004 (Ala.Civ.App. 1987) (emphasis added). The only exception to this rule of finality is when the trial court directs the entry of a final judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b), Ala. R. Civ. P. Bean, 557 So.2d at 1253. This appeal is from the dismissal of one of Garner’s two claims. Because the other claim remains pending, this court cannot now reach the merits of this case.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
ROBERTSON, P.J., and YATES, MONROE, and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.